Gap is a review step.
Name the specific point where the current workflow loses record context.
A guide to moving from isolated OCR outputs to source-linked reviewed records.
Open the review checklistA replacement is credible when it preserves the source, exposes uncertainty, and improves review ownership.
Name the specific point where the current workflow loses record context.
Identify the source, field, reviewer, and release state that need to stay connected.
Move in stages so the existing record remains explainable during changeover.
This page is for QA teams reviewing machine-assisted weld records working on OCR Tools. Use it as a practical part of AI-assisted weld-log preparation with an explicit human check.
For ocr tools, check source drawing and extracted field.
For ocr tools, check confidence and exception.
For ocr tools, check reviewer and correction.
Published by the Piping Tools Limited research and editorial team. Published 2026-07-25; reviewed 2026-07-28. External practitioner review is credited only when consent and scope are recorded. Coverage is limited to AI weld-log generation with source-linked human review.